up | next | prev | ptail | tail |
DEFINITIONS. If and are any two integers, positive or zero or negative, whose difference is divisible by , and are said to be congruent modulo , or congruent for the modulus , or congruent according to the modulus . Each of the numbers and is said to be a residue of the other.
To express the relation thus defined we may write
where is an integer (positive or zero or negative). It is more convenient, however, to use a special notation due to Gauss, and to write
an expression which is read is congruent to modulo , or is congruent to for the modulus , or is congruent to according to the modulus . This notation has the advantage that it involves only the quantities which are essential to the idea involved, whereas in the preceding expression we had the irrelevant integer . The Gaussian notation is of great value and convenience in the study of the theory of divisibility. In the present chapter we develop some of the fundamental elementary properties of congruences. It will be seen that many theorems concerning equations are likewise true of congruences with fixed modulus; and it is this analogy with equations which gives congruences (as such) one of their chief claims to attention.
As immediate consequences of our definitions we have the following fundamental theorems:
I. If , , then ; that is, for a given modulus, numbers congruent to the same number are congruent to each other.
For, by hypothesis, , , where and are integers. Then by subtraction we have ; whence .
II. If , , then ; that is, congruences with the same modulus may be added or subtracted member by member.
For, by hypothesis, , ; whence . Hence .
III. If , then , being any integer whatever.
The proof is obvious and need not be stated.
IV. If , , then ; that is, two congruences with the same modulus may be multiplied member by member.
For, we have , . Multiplying these equations member by member we have . Hence .
A repeated use of this theorem gives the following result:
V. If , then where is any positive integer.
As a corollary of theorems II, III and V we have the following more general result:
VI. If denotes any polynomial in with coefficients which are integers (positive or zero or negative) and if further , then
Let be any polynomial in with coefficients which are integers (positive or negative or zero). Then if and are any two integers it follows from the last theorem of the preceding section that
(1) |
Hence if is any value of for which the congruence
(2) |
is satisfied, then the congruence is also satisfied for , where is any integer whatever. The numbers are said to form a solution (or to be a root) of the congruence, being a variable integer. Any one of the integers may be taken as the representative of the solution. We shall often speak of one of these numbers as the solution itself.
Among the integers in a solution of the congruence (2) there is evidently one which is positive and not greater than . Hence all solutions of a congruence of the type (2) may be found by trial, a substitution of each of the numbers being made for . It is clear also that is the maximum number of solutions which (2) can have whatever be the function . By means of an example it is easy to show that this maximum number of solutions is not always possessed by a congruence; in fact, it is not even necessary that the congruence have a solution at all.
This is illustrated by the example
In order to show that no solution is possible it is necessary to make trial only of the values for . A direct substitution verifies the conclusion that none of them satisfies the congruence; and hence that the congruence has no solution at all.
On the other hand the congruence
has the solutions as one readily verifies; that is, this congruence has five solutions—the maximum number possible in accordance with the results obtained above.
EXERCISES
The properties of congruences relative to addition, subtraction and multiplication are entirely analogous to the properties of algebraic equations. But the properties relative to division are essentially different. These we shall now give.
I. If two numbers are congruent modulo they are congruent modulo , where is any divisor of .
For, from , we have . Hence .
II. If two numbers are congruent for different moduli they are congruent for a modulus which is the least common multiple of the given moduli.
The proof is obvious, since the difference of the given numbers is divisible by each of the moduli.
III. When the two members of a congruence are multiples of an integer prime to the modulus, each member of the congruence may be divided by .
For, if then is divisible by . Since is prime to it follows that is divisible by . Hence .
IV. If the two members of a congruence are divisible by an integer , having with the modulus the greatest common divisor , one obtains a congruence equivalent to the given congruence by dividing the two members by and the modulus by .
By hypothesis . Hence is divisible by . A necessary and sufficient condition for this is evidently that is divisible by . This leads at once to the desired result.
The congruence2
where is a prime number and the ’s are any integers, has not more than solutions.
Denote the first member of this congruence by so that the congruence may be written
(1) |
Suppose that is a root of the congruence, so that
Then we have f(x)
But, from algebra, is divisible by . Let be the highest power of contained in . Then we may write
(2) |
where is evidently a polynomial with integral coefficients. Hence we have
(3) |
We shall say that occurs times as a solution of (1); or that the congruence has solutions each equal to .
Now suppose that congruence (1) has a root such that . Then from (3) we have
But
Hence, since is a prime number, we must have
By an argument similar to that just used above, we may show that may be written in the form
where is some positive integer. Then we have
Now this process can be continued until either all the solutions of (1) are exhausted or the second member is a product of linear factors multiplied by the integer . In the former case there will be fewer than solutions of (1), so that our theorem is true for this case. In the other case we have
We have now solutions of (1): counted times, counted times, …, counted times; .
Now let be any solution of (1). Then
Since is prime it follows now that some one of the factors is divisible by . Hence coincides with one of the solutions . That is, (1) can have only the solutions already found.
This completes the proof of the theorem.
EXERCISES
having more than solutions and thus show that the limitation to a prime modulus in the theorem of this section is essential.
for every integer .
From the theorem of the preceding section it follows that the congruence
where is a prime number, has not more than one solution. In this section we shall prove that it always has a solution. More generally, we shall consider the congruence
where is any integer. The discussion will be broken up into parts for convenience in the proofs.
I. The congruence
(1) |
in which a and m are relatively prime, has one and only one solution.
The question as to the existence and number of the solutions of (1) is equivalent to the question as to the existence and number of integer pairs satisfying the equation,
(2) |
the integers being incongruent modulo . Since and are relatively prime it follows from theorem IV of § 1.9 that there exists a solution of equation (2). Let and be a particular solution of (2) and let and be any solution of (2). Then we have
whence
Hence is divisible by , since and are relatively prime. That is, . Hence and are representatives of the same solution of (1). Hence (1) has one and only one solution, as was to be proved.
II. The solution of the congruence , in which and are relatively prime, is prime to .
For, if is divisible by , is divisible by no factor of except .
III. The congruence
(3) |
in which and and also and are relatively prime, has one and only one solution.
Let be the unique solution of the congruence . Then we have . Now, by I we see that there is one and only one solution of the congruence ; and from this the theorem follows at once.
Suppose now that is prime to but that and have the greatest common divisor which is different from 1. Then it is easy to see that any solution of the congruence must be divisible by . The question of the existence of solutions of the congruence is then equivalent to the question of the existence of solutions of the congruence
where is the unknown integer. From III it follows that this congruence has a unique solution . Hence the congruence has the unique solution . Thus we have the following theorem:
IV. The congruence , in which and are relatively prime, has one and only one solution.
COROLLARY. The congruence , , where is a prime number, has one and only one solution.
It remains to examine the case of the congruence in which and have the greatest common divisor . It is evident that there is no solution unless also contains this divisor . Then let us suppose that , , . Then for every such that we have ; and conversely every satisfying the latter congruence also satisfies the former. Now , has only one solution. Let be a non-negative number less than , which satisfies the congruence . All integers which satisfy this congruence are then of the form , where is an integer. Hence all integers satisfying the congruence are of the form ; and every such integer is a representative of a solution of this congruence. It is clear that the numbers
(A) |
are incongruent modulo while every integer of the form is congruent modulo to a number of the set (A). Hence the congruence has the solutions (A).
This leads us to an important theorem which includes all the other theorems of this section as special cases. It may be stated as follows:
V. Let
be any linear congruence and let and have the greatest common divisor . Then a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of solutions of the congruence is that be divisible by . If this condition is satisfied the congruence has just solutions, and all the solutions are congruent modulo .
EXERCISES
up | next | prev | ptail | top |