up | next | prev | ptail | tail |
I t is shewn in § 24 that, if all the operations of a group are transformed by one of themselves, which is not self-conjugate, a correspondence is thereby established among the operations of the group which exhibits the group as simply isomorphic with itself.
In an Abelian group every operation is self-conjugate, and the only correspondence established in the manner indicated is that in which every operation corresponds to itself. If however in an Abelian group we take, as the operation which corresponds to any given operation , its inverse , then to will correspond or ; and the correspondence exhibits the group as simply isomorphic with itself. For this particular correspondence, a group of order is the only one in which each operation corresponds to itself.
It is therefore possible for every group, except a group of order , to establish a correspondence between the operations of the group, which shall exhibit the group as simply isomorphic with itself. Moreover, we shall see that in general there are such correspondences which cannot be established by either of the processes above given. We devote the present Chapter to a discussion of the isomorphism of a group with itself. It will be seen that, for many problems of group-theory, and in particular for the determination of the various types of group which are possible when the factor-groups of the composition-series are given, this discussion is most important.
155. Definition. A correspondence between the operations of a group, such that to every operation there corresponds a single operation , while to the product of two operations there corresponds the product of the corresponding operations, is said to define an isomorphism of the group with itself .
That isomorphism in which each operation corresponds to itself is called the identical isomorphism. In every isomorphism of a group with itself, the identical operation corresponds to itself; and the orders of two corresponding operations are the same. For if and were corresponding operations, so also would be and ; and therefore more than one operation would correspond to . Again, if and , of orders and , are corresponding operations, so also are and ; and therefore must be a multiple of . Similarly must be a multiple of ; and therefore and are equal.
If the operations of a group of order are represented by
and if, for a given isomorphism of the group with itself, is the operation that corresponds to (), the isomorphism will be completely represented by the symbolIn this symbol, two operations in the same vertical line are corresponding operations. When no risk of confusion is thereby introduced, the simpler symbol
is used.156. An isomorphism of a group with itself, thus defined, is not an operation. The symbol of an isomorphism however defines an operation. It may, in fact, be regarded as a substitution performed upon the letters which represent the operations of the group. Corresponding to every isomorphism there is thus a definite operation; and it is obvious that the operations, which correspond to two distinct isomorphisms, are themselves distinct. The totality of these operations form a group. For let
be any two isomorphisms of the group with itself. Then if, as hitherto, we use curved brackets to denote a substitution, we haveBut since is an isomorphism, the relation
requires thatAnd since is an isomorphism, the relation
requires thatHence if
then and therefore is an isomorphism.The product of the substitutions which correspond to two isomorphisms is therefore the substitution which corresponds to some other isomorphism.
The set of substitutions which correspond to the isomorphisms of a given group with itself, therefore form a group.
Definition. A group, which is simply isomorphic with the group thus derived from a given group, is called the group of isomorphisms of the given group.
It is not, of course, necessary always to regard this group as a group of substitutions performed on the symbols of the operations of the given group. But however the group of isomorphisms may be represented, each one of its operations corresponds to a definite isomorphism of the given group. To avoid an unnecessarily cumbrous phrase, we may briefly apply the term “isomorphism” to the operations of the group of isomorphisms. So long, at all events, as we are dealing with the properties of a group of isomorphisms, no risk of confusion is thereby introduced. Thus we shall use the phrase “the isomorphism ” as equivalent to “the operation of the group of isomorphisms which corresponds to the isomorphism .”
157. If is some operation of a group , while for each operation of the group is put in turn, the symbol
defines an isomorphism of the group. For if then and is an operation of the group. An isomorphism of a group, which is thus formed on transforming the operations of the group by one of themselves, is called a cogredient isomorphism. All others are called contragredient isomorphisms58. If is any contragredient isomorphism, the isomorphisms when for each operation of the group is taken successively, are said to form a class of contragredient isomorphisms.THEOREM I. The totality of the cogredient isomorphisms of a group form a group isomorphic with ; this group is a self-conjugate sub-group of the group of isomorphisms of 59.
The product of the isomorphisms
is given bywhere
The product of two cogredient isomorphisms is therefore another cogredient isomorphism; hence the cogredient isomorphisms form a group. Moreover, if we take the isomorphism
as corresponding to the operation of the group , then to every operation of there will correspond a definite cogredient isomorphism, so that to the product of any two operations of there corresponds the product of the two corresponding isomorphisms. The group and its group of cogredient isomorphisms are therefore isomorphic. If contains no self-conjugate operation, identity excepted, no two isomorphisms corresponding to different operations of can be identical; and therefore, in this case, is simply isomorphic with its group of cogredient isomorphisms. If however contains self-conjugate operations, forming a self-conjugate sub-group , then to every operation of there corresponds the identical isomorphism; and the group of cogredient isomorphisms is simply isomorphic with .Let now
be any isomorphism. ThenThe isomorphism therefore transforms every cogredient isomorphism into another cogredient isomorphism. It follows that the group of cogredient isomorphisms is self-conjugate within the group of isomorphisms.
158. Let be a group of order , whose operations are
and let be the group of isomorphisms of . We have seen in § 20 that may be represented as a transitive group of substitutions performed on the symbols and that, when it is so represented, the substitution which corresponds to the operation is or more shortlyWhen is thus represented, we will denote it by . We have already seen that can be represented as an intransitive substitution group of the same symbols; a typical substitution of , when it is so represented, is
or more shortlyWhen is thus represented, we will denote it by . It is clear that the two substitution groups and have no substitution in common except identity. For every substitution of leaves the symbol unchanged; and no substitution of , except identity, leaves unchanged.
Now
Every operation of is therefore permutable with . Hence if is the order of , the group , which we will call , is a transitive group of degree and order , containing self-conjugately. Further transforms into ; and these two substitutions of correspond to the operations and of . Hence the isomorphism, established on transforming the substitutions of by any substitution of , is the isomorphism denoted by the symbol .
Since is a substitution of , the substitution , or , belongs to . Hence contains the set of substitutions
These form (§ 107) a transitive group , simply isomorphic with and such that every substitution of is permutable with every substitution of . Moreover (l.c.), the substitutions of are the only substitutions of the symbols which are permutable with each of the substitutions of .
Suppose now that is any substitution of the symbols which is permutable with . When the substitutions of are transformed by , the resulting isomorphism is identical with that given by some substitution, say , of . Hence is a substitution of the symbols which is permutable with every substitution of . It therefore belongs to ; and hence belongs to . It follows that contains every substitution of the symbols which is permutable with .
The only substitutions common to and are the self-conjugate substitutions of either. The factor group is simply isomorphic with , where is the group of cogredient isomorphisms of contained in . The groups and are identical only when is Abelian; in this case, consists of the identical operation alone.
Definition. A group , simply isomorphic with the substitution group which has just been constructed, we shall call the holomorph of .
159. An isomorphism must change any set of operations, which are conjugate to each other, into another set which are conjugate. For if
be the isomorphism, and if then so that and are conjugate operations when and are conjugate. A cogredient isomorphism changes every set of conjugate operations into itself; and all the members of a class of contragredient isomorphisms permute the conjugate sets in the same way. If is an isomorphism which changes every conjugate set of operations of into itself, and if is any isomorphism of , then the isomorphism changes every conjugate set into itself. It follows that those isomorphisms, which change every conjugate set of operations into itself, form a self-conjugate sub-group of the complete group of isomorphisms. This sub-group clearly contains the group of cogredient isomorphisms and may be identical with it.If now is any isomorphism of of order , the substitutions
generate a group of order . When is used to represent the isomorphism, this group may be denoted by ; as shewn above, it contains self-conjugately. Suppose that is prime and not a factor of . The operation is not permutable with every operation of ; and therefore there must be operations of which are permutable with no operation of the conjugate set to which belongs. The number of operations which in are conjugate to such an operation must be a multiple of ; and since is not a factor of , this conjugate set of operations must be made up of distinct conjugate sets of operations in . The isomorphism must therefore interchange some of the conjugate sets of .The same result is clearly true if the order of has any prime factor not contained in . Hence:—
THEOREM II. An isomorphism of a group , whose order contains a prime factor which does not occur in the order of , must interchange some of the conjugate sets of .
160. If the isomorphism or leaves no operation except identity unchanged, it must in be one of conjugate operations. For if
would be permutable with , which is not the case.These conjugate operations are
and since the first transforms every operation of , except identity, into a different one, the same must be true of all the set. If now transformed any operation into a conjugate operation would transform into itself; hence must transform every conjugate set of into a different conjugate set.The special case in which the order of is two may here be considered. Representing the operations conjugate to by
the operations of areNow
so that transforms every operation of into its own inverse. But if and thenNow as is the operation into which the isomorphism transforms , it must be , and therefore
The group is therefore an Abelian group of odd order.
161. Any sub-group of is transformed by an isomorphism into a simply isomorphic sub-group ; but and are not necessarily conjugate within . If however the set of conjugate sub-groups
are the only sub-groups of of a given type, every isomorphism must interchange them among themselves; and if no isomorphism transforms each one of the set into itself, the group of isomorphisms can be represented as a transitive group of degree .Suppose now that no operation of is permutable with each of the conjugate sub-groups
so that , or what in this case is the same thing (since can have no self-conjugate operation except identity) the group of cogredient isomorphisms of , can be expressed as the transitive group of symbols that arises on transforming the set of sub-groups by each operation of . Let be any operation, of order , that transforms and each of the set of conjugate sub-groups, into itself. Then is the lowest power of that can occur in , since no operation of transforms each of the sub-groups into itself. Now in , the greatest sub-group that contains self-conjugately is , being the greatest sub-group of that contains self-conjugately. Also, in the set of sub-groups , (), is a complete conjugate set. Now the set of groups have by supposition no common operation except identity; and therefore the greatest common sub-group of is . Hence is a self-conjugate sub-group of ; and since is also a self-conjugate sub-group of , while and have no common operation except identity, must be permutable with every operation of . Every operation therefore which is permutable with , and with each of the sub-groups is permutable with every operation of . Thus finally, no contragredient isomorphism can transform each of the sub-groups () into itself. Hence:—THEOREM III. If the conjugate set of sub-groups
contains all the sub-groups of of a given type, and if no operation of is permutable with each sub-group of the set, the group of isomorphisms of can be represented as a transitive group of degree .Corollary I. If contains sub-groups of order , where is the highest power of a prime that divides the order of ; and if the greatest sub-group , that contains a sub-group of order self-conjugately, contains no self-conjugate sub-group of ; then the group of isomorphisms of can be represented as a transitive group of degree .
For it has been seen that the groups of order contained in form a single conjugate set.
Corollary II. If the conjugate set of sub-groups of
is changed into itself by every isomorphism of , and if no operation of is permutable with every one of these sub-groups; then the group of isomorphisms of can be expressed as a transitive group of degree .In fact, under the conditions stated, the reasoning applied to prove the theorem may be used to shew that no isomorphism of can transform each of the sub-groups into itself.
162. Definition. Any sub-group of a group which is transformed into itself by every isomorphism of , is called60 a characteristic sub-group of .
A characteristic sub-group of a group is necessarily a self-conjugate sub-group of ; but a self-conjugate sub-group is not necessarily characteristic. A simple group, having no self-conjugate sub-groups, can have no characteristic sub-groups. Let now be any group, and let be the holomorph of . A characteristic sub-group of is then a self-conjugate sub-group of ; and conversely, every self-conjugate sub-group of which is contained in is a characteristic sub-group of .
Suppose now a chief-series of formed which contains . If has no characteristic sub-group, it must be the last term but one of this series, the last term being identity. It follows by § 94 that must be the direct product of a number of simply isomorphic simple groups. Hence:—
THEOREM IV. A group, which has no characteristic sub-group, must be either a simple group or the direct product of simply isomorphic simple groups.
The converse of this theorem is clearly true.
163. Suppose now that is a group which has characteristic sub-groups; and let
be a series of such sub-groups, each containing all that follow it and chosen so that, for each consecutive pair and , there is no characteristic sub-group of contained in and containing , except itself. Such a series is called61 a characteristic series of .It may clearly be possible to choose such a series in more than one way. If
be a second characteristic series of , thenare two chief-series of . In fact, if had a self-conjugate sub-group contained in and containing , then would have a characteristic sub-group contained in and containing . The two chief-series of coincide in the terms from to inclusive. Hence the two sets of factor-groups
and must be equal in number and, except possibly as regards the sequence in which they occur, identical in type. Moreover, each factor-group must be either a simple group or the direct product of simply isomorphic simple groups.164. We will now shew how to determine a characteristic series for a group whose order is the power of a prime62.
First, let the group be Abelian; and suppose that it is generated by a set of independent operations, of which are of the order , (), while
The sub-group (§ 42), formed of the operations of which satisfy the relation
is clearly a characteristic sub-group. As a first step towards forming the characteristic series, we may take the set of groups for this is a set of characteristic sub-groups such that each contains the one that follows it.Now the sub-group (§ 45), formed of the distinct operations that remain when every operation of is raised to the power , is also a characteristic sub-group; and since the operations common to two characteristic sub-groups also form a characteristic sub-group, the sub-group (common to and ) is characteristic. It follows from this that will be a characteristic sub-group only when . If , is not contained in , and the common sub-group of these two is characteristic. If , this sub-group again is not contained in ; and the common sub-group of and is a characteristic sub-group contained in . Continuing thus, we form between and the series
In a similar way, between and we introduce such of the series
as are distinct, the symbol being replaced by zero where it is negative.From the original series we thus form a new one, in which again each group is characteristic and contains the following. This series may be shewn to be a characteristic series.
Let
be the generating operations of , whose orders are . Then if and are distinct, the generating operations of the latter differ only from those of the former in containing the set in the place ofNow any permutation of the generating operations
among themselves, the remaining generating operations being unaltered, must clearly give an isomorphism of with itself; and therefore no sub-group of , contained in and containing , can be a characteristic sub-group. This result being true for every pair of distinct groups which succeed each other in the series that has been formed, it follows that the series is a characteristic series. It may be noticed that, if and are any two consecutive sub-groups in a characteristic series of , the order of must be , where is one of the numbers .Secondly, suppose that is not Abelian. We may first consider the series of sub-groups
of § 53. Each of these is clearly a characteristic sub-group, and each contains the succeeding. Moreover, is an Abelian group; and, by the process that we have just investigated, a characteristic series may be formed for it. To each group in this series will correspond a characteristic sub-group of containing ; and the set of groups so obtained forms part of a complete characteristic series of . When between each consecutive pair of groups in the above series the groups thus formed are interpolated, the resulting series of groups is a characteristic series for .165. The isomorphisms of a given group with itself are closely connected with the composition of every composite group in which the given group enters as a self-conjugate sub-group. Let be any composite group and a self-conjugate sub-group of . Then since every operation of transforms into itself, to every such operation will correspond an isomorphism of with itself. If is an operation of not contained in , and if the isomorphism of arising on transforming its operations by is contragredient, so also is the isomorphism arising from each of the set of operations . In this case, no one of this set of operations is permutable with every operation of . If however the isomorphism arising from is cogredient, there must be some operation of which gives the same isomorphism as ; and then is permutable with every operation of . In this case, the set of operations will give all the cogredient isomorphisms of .
Suppose now that is that sub-group of which is formed of all the operations of that are permutable with every operation of . Then to every operation of , not contained in , must correspond a contragredient isomorphism of ; and to every operation of the factor group corresponds a class of contragredient isomorphisms. If then is the group of isomorphisms of , and if is that self-conjugate sub-group of which gives the cogredient isomorphisms of , must be simply isomorphic with a sub-group of .
If now contains no self-conjugate operation except identity, and can contain no common operation except identity; and since each of them is a self-conjugate sub-group of , every operation of is permutable with every operation of . In this case, is the direct product of and .
If, further, coincides with , so that admits of no contragredient isomorphisms, must reduce to identity. In this case, is the direct product of and .
Definition. A group, which contains no self-conjugate operation except identity and which admits of no contragredient isomorphism, is called63 a complete group.
The result of the present paragraph may be expressed in the form:—
THEOREM V. A group, which contains a complete group as a self-conjugate sub-group, must be the direct product of the complete group and some other group64.
166. THEOREM VI. If is a group with no self-conjugate operations except identity; and if the group of cogredient isomorphisms of is a characteristic sub-group of , the group of isomorphisms of ; then is a complete group65.
With the notation of § 158, the operations of may be represented by the substitutions
The group of cogredient isomorphisms, which we will call , is given by the substitutions it is simply isomorphic with .Now
and therefore no operation of is permutable with every operation of . Hence every isomorphism of is given on transforming its operations by those of . Suppose now that is an operation which transforms into itself. Since is by supposition a characteristic sub-group of , the operation transforms into itself. If does not belong to , we may assume that is permutable with every operation of . For if it is not, it must give the same isomorphism of as some operation of ; and then is permutable with every operation of , and is not contained in . Now being permutable with every operation of , we have
where is any operation of , and any operation of .Moreover
and thereforeHence and give the same isomorphism of . Now no two distinct operations of give the same isomorphism of , so that and must be identical; in other words, is permutable with every operation of . Hence admits of no contragredient isomorphisms. Moreover, has no self-conjugate operations, and no operation of is permutable with every operation of ; hence has no self-conjugate operations. It is therefore a complete group.
Corollary. If is a simple group of composite order, or if it is the direct product of a number of isomorphic simple groups of composite order, the group of isomorphisms of is a complete group.
For suppose, if possible, in this case that is not a characteristic sub-group of ; and that, by a contragredient isomorphism of , is transformed into . Then is a self-conjugate sub-group of , and each of the groups and transforms the other into itself. Hence (§ 34) either every operation of is permutable with every operation of , or and must have a common sub-group. The former supposition is impossible since no operation of is permutable with every operation of . On the other hand, if and have a common sub-group, it is a self-conjugate sub-group of and it therefore is a characteristic sub-group of . Now (§ 162) has no characteristic sub-groups, and therefore the second supposition is also impossible. It follows that, in this case, is a characteristic sub-group of , and that is a complete group.
167. THEOREM VII. If is an Abelian group of odd order, and if is the holomorph of ; then when is a characteristic sub-group of , the latter group is a complete group.
If is the order of , then can be expressed (§ 158) as a transitive group of degree . When is so expressed, those operations of which leave one symbol unchanged form a sub-group , which is simply isomorphic with the group of isomorphisms of . Now (§ 160) an Abelian group of odd order admits of a single isomorphism of order two, which changes every operation into its own inverse. The corresponding substitution of is a self-conjugate substitution in , and is one of conjugate substitutions in . These are the only substitutions of which transform every substitution of into its inverse. If is a characteristic sub-group of , every isomorphism of must transform , and therefore also the set of conjugate substitutions of order two, into itself. Also, no substitution of can be permutable with each one of these substitutions, since each of them keeps just one symbol unchanged. Hence (Theorem III, Cor. II, § 161) the group of isomorphisms of can be expressed as a transitive group of degree , which contains as a transitive self-conjugate sub-group. But when the group of isomorphisms of is so expressed, itself consists of all the substitutions of the symbols which are permutable with ; and at the same time, every isomorphism of transforms into itself. Hence the group of isomorphisms of must coincide with itself; i.e. admits of no contragredient isomorphisms. Also obviously contains no self-conjugate operation except identity; hence it is a complete group.
Corollary. The holomorph of an Abelian group of order , where is an odd prime, and type , is a complete group.
For if, in this case, is not a characteristic sub-group of , let be a sub-group of which, in the group of isomorphisms of , is conjugate to . Then and being both self-conjugate in must have a common sub-group, since cannot contain their direct product. But the common sub-group of and , being self-conjugate in , is a characteristic sub-group of . This is impossible (§ 162); hence is a characteristic sub-group of .
Ex. Shew that the holomorph of an Abelian group of degree and type is a complete group.
168. We shall now discuss the groups of isomorphisms of certain special groups; and we shall begin with the case of a cyclical group , of prime order , generated by an operation . Every isomorphism of such a group must interchange among themselves the operations
and if any isomorphism replaces by , it must replace by , and so on. Moreover, the symbol does actually represent an isomorphism whatever number may be from to ; for each operation occurs once in the second line, and the change indicated leaves the multiplication-table of the group unaltered. If , the symbol does not represent an isomorphism: if , the symbol represents the same isomorphism asThe group of isomorphisms of a group of prime order is therefore a group of order . Now the th power of the isomorphism
isHence if is a primitive root of the congruence
the group of isomorphisms is a cyclical group generated by the isomorphismFinally, if is an operation satisfying the relations
where is a primitive root of , is the holomorph of .The reader will at once observe that this group of order is identical with the doubly transitive group of § 112. It is a complete group.
169. We shall consider next the case of any cyclical group.
Suppose, first, that is a cyclical group of order , where is an odd prime; and let it be generated by an operation . The group contains operations of order ; if is any one of these,
defines a distinct isomorphism. The group of isomorphisms is therefore a group of order . Moreover, since the congruence has primitive roots, the group of isomorphisms is a cyclical group. The holomorph of is defined by where is a primitive root of the congruenceIf is a cyclical group of order , it follows, in the same way, that the group of isomorphisms is an Abelian group of order . In this case, however, the congruence
has no primitive root, and therefore the group of isomorphisms is not cyclical. The congruence however has primitive roots, and a primitive root of this congruence can always be found to satisfy the conditionThe powers of the isomorphism
then form a cyclical group of order ; and the only isomorphism of order contained in it isHence
the latter not being contained in the sub-group generated by the former, are two permutable and independent isomorphisms of orders and . They generate an Abelian group of order which is the group of isomorphisms of . The corresponding holomorph is given bywhere satisfies the conditions given above.
If is a cyclical group of order , its group of isomorphisms is clearly a group of order .
170. It is now easy to construct the group of isomorphisms of any cyclical group , and the corresponding holomorph. If the order of is , where , , … are odd primes, is the direct product of cyclical groups of orders , , , …; and every isomorphism of transforms each of these groups into itself. Hence if the groups of isomorphisms of these cyclical groups be formed, and their direct product be then constructed, every operation of the group so formed will give a distinct isomorphism of the group . Moreover, the order
of this group is equal to the number of operations of whose order is , or in other words to the number of isomorphisms of which is capable. The group thus formed is therefore the group of isomorphisms of . The corresponding holomorph is clearly the direct product of the holomorphs of the cyclical groups of orders , , etc.When the order of is odd, the holomorph is easily shewn to be a complete group. Suppose it to be expressed transitively, as in § 158, in symbols, where is the order of ; if is not a characteristic sub-group of , let be a group into which is transformed by a contragredient isomorphism of . Then is a self-conjugate sub-group of ; and since is cyclical, every sub-group of ’ is a self-conjugate sub-group of . Hence a generating operation of must be a circular substitution of symbols. The operations of order which transform each operation of into its own inverse therefore each keep one symbol fixed; hence each of them must transform every operation of into its inverse. But there is only one such set of operations of order , and therefore cannot differ from . It follows by Theorem VII, § 167 that, as is a characteristic sub-group of , the group itself is complete.
If the order of is even, must contain a self-conjugate operation other than identity, namely the operation of order contained in . Moreover, admits of a contragredient isomorphism whose square is cogredient. From the mode of formation of , it is clearly sufficient to verify this when the order of is a power of . The holomorph is given by
where is a primitive root of
such thatIn this group, is one of conjugate operations
Now it may be directly verified that admits the isomorphism represented by
Moreover, since this isomorphism changes into , it cannot be a cogredient isomorphism. Finally, the square of this isomorphism is or which is a cogredient isomorphism.171. We shall next consider the group of isomorphisms of an Abelian group of order and type . Such a group is generated by independent permutable operations of order , say
Since every operation of the group is self-conjugate and of order , while the group contains no characteristic sub-group, there must be isomorphisms transforming any one operation of the group into any other. We may therefore begin by determining under what conditions the symbol
defines an isomorphism. This symbol replaces the operation by , whereUnless the operations thus formed are all distinct, when for is put successively each of the operations of the group, the symbol does not represent an isomorphism. On the other hand, when this condition is satisfied, the symbol represents a permutation of the operations among themselves which leaves the multiplication table of the group unchanged; it is therefore an isomorphism.
If this condition is satisfied, , , …, must be definite numbers , when , , …, are given; and therefore the above set of simultaneous congruences must be capable of definite solution with respect to the ’s. The necessary and sufficient condition for this is that the determinant
should not be congruent to zero .Every distinct set of congruences of the above form, for which this condition is satisfied, represents a distinct isomorphism of the group, two sets being regarded as distinct if the congruence
does not hold for each corresponding pair of coefficients. Moreover, to the product of two isomorphisms will correspond the set of congruences which results from carrying out successively the operations indicated by the two sets that correspond to the two isomorphisms.The group of isomorphisms is therefore simply isomorphic with the group of operations defined by all sets of congruences
for which the relation is satisfied.172. The group thus defined is of great importance in many branches of analysis. It is known as the linear homogeneous group. In a subsequent Chapter we shall consider some of its more important properties; we may here conveniently determine its order. Let this be represented by , so that represents the number of distinct solutions of the congruences
Since the group of isomorphisms of the Abelian group of order transforms every one of its operations (identity excepted) into every other, it can be represented as a transitive substitution group of symbols, and therefore, if is the order of the sub-group that keeps unchanged,
Now, in the congruences corresponding to an operation that keeps unchanged, we have
Hence is equal to the number of solutions of the congruences
The value of the determinant does not depend on the values of , , …, , and therefore
Hence
and therefore immediatelyThe reader will notice that an independent proof of this result has already been obtained in § 48. The discussion there given of the number of distinct ways, in which independent generating operations of an Abelian group of type may be chosen, is clearly equivalent to a determination of the order of the corresponding group of isomorphisms.
The holomorph of an Abelian group, of order and type , can similarly be represented as a group of linear transformations to the prime modulus . Consider, in fact, the set of transformations
where the coefficients take all integral values consistent withThe set of transformations clearly forms a group whose order is . The sub-group formed by all the transformations
is an Abelian group of order and type , and it is a self-conjugate sub-group. Moreover, the only operations of the group, which are permutable with every operation of this self-conjugate sub-group, are the operations of the sub-group itself; and, since the order of the group is equal to the order of the holomorph of the Abelian group, it follows that the group of transformations must be simply isomorphic with the holomorph of the Abelian group. In the simplest instance, where is , the holomorph is simply isomorphic with the alternating group of four symbols. In any case the holomorph, when expressed as in § 158, is a doubly transitive group of degree .173. It has been seen in § 142 that, except when , the symmetric group of degree has and only sub-groups of order , which form a conjugate set. Hence by Theorem III, § 161, the group of isomorphisms of the symmetric group of degree can be expressed, except when , as a transitive group of degree . The symmetric group of symbols however consists of all possible substitutions that can be performed on the symbols, and therefore it must coincide with its group of isomorphisms. Hence66:—
THEOREM VIII. The symmetric group of symbols is a complete group, except when .
Corollary. Except when , the alternating group of symbols admits of one and only one class of contragredient isomorphisms.
For with this exception, the alternating group of degree has just sub-groups of order .
174. The alternating group of degree occurs as a special case of another class of groups of which we will determine the groups of isomorphisms. These are the doubly and the triply transitive groups that have been defined in §§ 112, 113.
The doubly transitive group of degree and order there considered has a single set of conjugate cyclical sub-groups of order . Its group of isomorphisms can therefore be expressed as a transitive group of degree . Let be the order of the group of isomorphisms. The order of a sub-group that keeps two symbols fixed is ; and every operation of this sub-group must transform a cyclical sub-group of order into itself. With the notation of § 112, we will consider the sub-group which keeps and fixed. Every operation of this sub-group must transform the cyclical sub-group generated by the congruence67
into itself; and no operation of the sub-group can be permutable with the given operation. If is an operation of the sub-group which transforms into then , when represented as a substitution, is given byNow must transform the sub-group of order into itself; it must therefore be permutable with that operation of this sub-group which changes into .
This operation is given by
and if we denote it by , then changes into , whereNow changes into . Hence, since and are permutable, we must for all values of have the simultaneous congruences
andEliminating , the congruence
must hold for all values of from to . If is not a power of , this congruence involves an identity of the form where all the indices are less than ; and this is impossible. Hence the only possible values of are , , , …; and the greatest possible value of is .Now the congruence
defines a substitution performed on the symbols permuted by the group, and this substitution is permutable with the group. For if we denote this operation by , and any operation of the group by , then is another operation of the group. Moreover, clearly transforms into its th power.The group of isomorphisms of the doubly transitive group of order is therefore the group defined by
where is a primitive root of the congruenceFrom this it immediately follows that the group of isomorphisms of the triply transitive group, of degree and order
defined by the congruences where , , , satisfy the conditions of § 113, is the group of order obtained by combining the previous congruences withIn fact, it may be immediately verified that the operation given by this congruence is permutable with the group, and does not give a cogredient isomorphism of the group. Moreover, by Theorem III, § 161, the group of isomorphisms of the given group can be expressed as a transitive group of degree ; and therefore, among a class of contragredient isomorphisms, there must be some transforming into itself a sub-group which keeps one symbol fixed. Hence the order of the group of isomorphisms cannot exceed
When is an odd prime, the triply transitive group of degree , which may be defined by
contains as a self-conjugate sub-group a doubly transitive group defined byIt will be shewn in Chapter XIV that this is a simple group. When is equal to , it is easy to verify that this group is simply isomorphic with the alternating group of degree .
The group of isomorphisms of this simple group can be expressed as a transitive group of degree , and must clearly contain the triply transitive group of order self-conjugately. It therefore coincides with the group of order , which has just been determined. The latter group is therefore (Theorem VI, Cor. § 166) a complete group. Further, if the simple group be denoted by and the group of isomorphisms by , the factor group will be determined by
when all operations of are treated as the identical operation. Denoting these operations by and , then is , which is the same as multiplied by an operation of . Hence is an Abelian group generated by two independent operations of orders and .The group of isomorphisms of the alternating group of degree is therefore a group of order ; and the symmetric group of degree admits a single class of contragredient isomorphisms68.
175. Let be any group whose order is the power of a prime, and let
of orders be a characteristic series (§ 163) of . Every isomorphism of must transform and into themselves, and therefore also into itself. Suppose now that an isomorphism of transforms every operation of into itself and every operation of into itself. If is any operation of , not contained in , must transform into , where is some operation of ; so that, if is the order of , transforms the operations of the set cyclically among themselves in sets of . Similarly, if is an operation of not contained in the set , will transform the operations of the set cyclically among themselves in sets of . Hence the order of the isomorphism is a multiple of ; and any isomorphism, that transforms every operation of into itself and every operation of into itself and is of order prime to , will transform every operation of into itself. Therefore, the only isomorphism of , that transforms every operation of each of the groups into itself and is of order prime to , is the identical isomorphism. Now each of these groups is an Abelian group, whose operations are all of order ; and it has been shewn that, if is the order of such a group, the order of its group of isomorphisms isEvery isomorphism of , whose order is relatively prime to , must therefore be such that its order is a factor of one of the expressions of the above form, obtained by writing
in succession for . If then is the greatest of these numbers, the order of any isomorphism of , whose order is relatively prime to , is a factor ofHerr Frobenius69 has introduced the symbol to denote this product. If is a group of order , where , , …, are distinct primes, and if , , …, are groups of orders , , …, contained in , we shall use the symbol to denote the least common multiple of
176. If is a sub-group of a group of order , is not necessarily a factor of . For instance, the group of order , generated by the four operations , , , of order , of which and are self-conjugate while
has a characteristic sub-group of order , and it has no characteristic sub-group of order . HenceThe sub-group however, which is generated by , and , is an Abelian group whose operations are all of order ; and therefore
So again, for the Abelian group of order , generated by and , where
we have while its sub-group , generated by and , is an Abelian group whose operations are all of order , so thatSuppose now that is an Abelian group of order , generated by independent and permutable operations. For such a group, we define70 a new symbol by the equation
In forming the characteristic series of in § 164, we commenced with the series of groups (), such that consists of all the operations of satisfying the relation
Since is generated by independent operations, the order of is , and the order of cannot be greater than . If the generating operations of are all of the same order , the series
is a complete characteristic series of , and each factor-group is of order . In this case, therefore,If however the generating operations are not all of the same order, will not be the last term of the complete characteristic series; nor will and be consecutive terms in the series, if the order of is . Hence, in this case, will be a factor of .
If now is any sub-group of , then it has been seen (§ 46) that the number of independent generating operations of is equal to or less than . Hence is equal to or is a factor of .
177. THEOREM IX. If a group , of order , is transformed into itself by an operation , whose order is relatively prime to , every operation of is permutable with 71.
Let be the highest power of a prime which divides . The number of sub-groups of , and therefore also of , whose order is is a factor of ; and since the order of is relatively prime to , one at least of them, say , must be transformed into itself by . Now the order of is relatively prime both to and to ; and therefore the isomorphism of given on transforming its operations by must be the identical isomorphism. In other words, is permutable with every operation of . In the same way it follows that, if , , … are the highest powers of , , … that divide , there must be sub-groups of orders , , … with every operation of each of which is permutable. But these groups of orders , , , … generate ; therefore is permutable with every operation of .
Corollary. If the order of an isomorphism of is relatively prime to , it must be a factor of .
It follows immediately, from the theorem, that there is no isomorphism of whose order contains a prime factor not occurring in . Suppose, if possible, that the group of isomorphisms of contains an operation of order , where is a prime which does not divide , and that the highest power of that divides is , where . If is the highest power of any prime which divides , must transform some sub-group of order into itself. Since is not a factor of , some power of must be permutable with every operation of . Hence, as in the theorem, it follows that some power of , certainly , must be permutable with every operation of . But no operation of the group of isomorphisms of , except identity, is permutable with every operation of . Hence the group of isomorphisms cannot contain an operation of order , if ; and therefore there is no isomorphism of whose order contains a higher power of than . If then , a number relatively prime to , is the order of an isomorphism of , all the numbers , , … are factors of , and so also is their product.
178. The method, by which it has been shewn in § 175 that the order of any isomorphism of which transforms every operation of each of the groups and into itself is a power of , may be used to obtain the following more general result.
THEOREM X. If is a self-conjugate sub-group of , the order of an isomorphism of , which transforms every operation of each of the groups and into itself, is a factor of the order of .
If is any operation of not contained in , the isomorphism will change into , where is some operation of . If then is the order of , the isomorphism transforms
cyclically; and therefore it transforms all the operations of the set in cycles of each. If is any operation of not contained in , the isomorphism will interchange the operations of the set among themselves in cycles of each, where again is the order of some operation of . The isomorphism, when expressed as a substitution performed on the operations of , will consist of a number of cycles of , , … symbols; and its order is therefore the least common multiple of , , …. Now if is any prime that divides the order of , and the highest power of that occurs as the order of a cyclical operation of , no power of higher than can occur in any of the numbers , , …; and is therefore the highest power of that can occur in their least common multiple. This least common multiple, which is the order of the isomorphism, must therefore divide the order of .179. Ex. 1. Shew that, for the group of order defined by
the symbol
gives an isomorphism if Hence determine the order of the group of isomorphisms.Ex. 2. Shew that, for the group of order defined by
the symbol gives an isomorphism if is not a multiple of ; and determine the order of the group of isomorphisms.Ex. 3. Shew that the group of isomorphisms of the group of order , defined by (§ 63)
is of order , when . If , its order is and it is simply isomorphic with the last type but one of § 84.Ex. 4. If is a complete group of order , shew that the order of , the holomorph of , is ; and that the order of the holomorph of is .
up | next | prev | ptail | top |